Whether a company is setting up a baseline privacy program or needs to update an existing one, it’s easy to feel inundated by the sheer number of laws that need to be addressed. It’s a phenomenon so common that it even has a nickname: “privacy fatigue”.
Personalized marketing materials still work wonders, but how can your company collect enough data for personalization without violating privacy laws? What’s the balance between respecting user privacy and effectively using data? Let’s explore these questions further.
AI in marketing comes with inherent risks still being uncovered. Companies that choose to take advantage of AI need to understand the impact it can truly have, both now and as the technology continues to evolve. One excellent way to start is an AI audit.
Since customers no longer want to hand out large amounts of personal information (and you may not be allowed to ask in the first place), how can you continue using CTAs effectively when you don’t have explicit consent? One answer comes from a concept cemented in the GDPR: legitimate interest.
Humans love to collect things. But in the corporate world, the most prevalent kind of collecting—data hoarding—is far from innocent and can leave your company vulnerable to data breaches, fines, or worse.
Generally speaking, marketing and legal have differing priorities when data privacy is involved. How can marketing and legal learn to understand each other and work together effectively?
One of the best ways for marketers to stay informed is by monitoring key privacy metrics that highlight the impact of regulations on your work.
In today’s data-driven world, the need for privacy-first marketing has never been more relevant. In this blog post, we will go over three basic steps you should follow when implementing a privacy-first marketing strategy.
Marketing and privacy are functionally two sides of the same coin. Unfortunately, these complementary roles can feel like they’re in conflict. Is it possible for these two departments to work together?